Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001 date index

freeciv-dev December 2001

• December 11, 2001
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [FreeCiv-Cvs] rfalke: Add a new server variable "savepalace" which..., Reinier Post, 13:47
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Paul Zastoupil, 13:46
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 13:40
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Jason Short, 13:38
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Jason Short, 13:23
  • [Freeciv-Dev] polish ruleset (PR#1125), mateusz stefek, 12:36
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Fog of war only for the AI (PR#1120), jdorje, 11:43
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [freeciv-data] Re: PATCH: Swedish Natural City Names (PR#1124), sigra, 11:15
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [freeciv-data] Re: PATCH: Swedish Natural City Names (PR#1123), sigra, 11:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [freeciv-data] PATCH: Swedish Natural City Names (PR#1122), sigra, 11:09
  • [Freeciv-Dev] PATCH: Swedish Natural City Names (PR#1121), sigra, 11:07
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Reinier Post, 10:49
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Raimar Falke, 09:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Fog of war only for the AI (PR#1120), Reinier Post, 09:24
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Petr Baudis, 08:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] OTC: SEPT..Great Growth Potential with Revolutionary New Product.. NYWIZUWVZ, NewSEPTalert, 08:36
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Ben Webb, 08:05
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Fog of war only for the AI (PR#1120), gianmario . scotti, 08:02
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Ben Webb, 07:29
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Daniel Sjölie, 07:20
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 07:14
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Per I. Mathisen, 07:02
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Ben Webb, 07:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Raahul Kumar, 06:45
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Daniel Sjölie, 06:16
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Ben Webb, 06:08
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Daniel Sjölie, 04:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Reinier Post, 04:10
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: segmentation fault bug (PR#1119), Reinier Post, 03:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Reinier Post, 03:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Reinier Post, 03:40
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Daniel Sjölie, 03:12
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Daniel Sjölie, 03:03
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: feedback when playing large civilisations (PR#1088), Petrus Viljoen, 02:47
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Raimar Falke, 02:06
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: feedback when playing large civilisations (PR#1088), Raimar Falke, 01:55
• December 10, 2001
  • [Freeciv-Dev] New LINUX Site - Greetings, Murali Kumar, 22:08
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Generalised calculation of city bonuses (PR#1117), Raahul Kumar, 21:05
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Generalised improvements testing, Raahul Kumar, 20:40
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Ross W. Wetmore, 18:32
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Ross W. Wetmore, 18:29
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Ross W. Wetmore, 18:29
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 17:45
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Daniel L Speyer, 17:29
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 17:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] segmentation fault bug (PR#1119), dr_zeus, 17:06
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Is the city names patch good?, Takacs Gabor, 16:49
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Generalised improvements testing, Ben Webb, 16:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Tony Stuckey, 16:24
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: feedback when playing large civilisations (PR#1088), <s.yeates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 16:16
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Several bugs discovered when playing large civilisations (PR#1088), <s.yeates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 16:04
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 15:21
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Improvement effect definitions (PR#1104), Ben Webb, 15:04
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Improvement effect definitions (PR#1104), Ben Webb, 15:04
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Jason Short, 14:57
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 14:55
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Reinier Post, 14:46
  • [Freeciv-Dev] PATCH: no more option tweaking during the select nation dialog (was: Development Strategies), Reinier Post, 14:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Tony Stuckey, 14:23
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Improvement effect definitions (PR#1104), jdorje, 13:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] New City dialog happiness generalisation (PR#1116), jdorje, 13:06
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Improvement effect definitions (PR#1104), jdorje, 13:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] New City dialog happiness generalisation (PR#1116), Ben Webb, 12:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] New City dialog happiness generalisation (PR#1116), Ben Webb, 12:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Daniel L Speyer, 12:36
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] Generalised improvement name generation (PR#1118), Ben Webb, 12:32
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] New City dialog happiness generalisation (PR#1116), jdorje, 12:18
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] Generalised calculation of city bonuses (PR#1117), Ben Webb, 12:13
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 11:58
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] New City dialog happiness generalisation (PR#1116), Ben Webb, 11:38
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Reinier Post, 11:34
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Reinier Post, 11:28
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] Gen-impr effects: iteration (PR#1115), Ben Webb, 11:22
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] Generalised improvements effects: implementation (PR#1114), Ben Webb, 11:06
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Gratis!, Webmaster, 08:35
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: horse in the ocean, Karl-Ingo Friese, 06:19
  • [Freeciv-Dev] horse in ocean (PR#1113), hjr . boehm, 06:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Raimar Falke, 05:07
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Neil Stevens, 02:06
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Daniel Sjölie, 00:50
• December 09, 2001
  • [Freeciv-Dev] failure notice (PR#1112), MAILER-DAEMON, 22:59
  • [Freeciv-Dev] failure notice (PR#1110), MAILER-DAEMON, 22:58
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 19:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Kevin Brown, 17:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Reinier Post, 16:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation,Usability and Development], Kevin Brown, 16:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Client core (PR#1107), Andreas Kemnade, 13:07
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Several bugs discovered when playing large civilisations (PR#1088), Raimar Falke, 10:37
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Game over not logged properly (PR#1076), Raimar Falke, 09:47
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Re: All cities have trade of 0 (PR#1070), Raimar Falke, 09:44
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 09:20
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 09:06
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Tech cost patch v14 (PR#1082), Juha Litola, 08:43
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Changing interface for generate_warmap (PR#1108), Reinier Post, 07:45
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] city_landlocked_sell_coastal_improvements generalisation (PR#1105), Reinier Post, 07:42
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Tech cost patch v14 (PR#1082), Reinier Post, 07:39
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Tech cost patch v15 (PR#1082), Juha Litola, 05:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Changing interface for generate_warmap (PR#1108), Gregory Berkolaiko, 05:28
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Tech cost patch v14 (PR#1082), Juha Litola, 05:20
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Criticism, Raahul Kumar, 02:56
• December 08, 2001
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Client core (PR#1107), Mike Kaufman, 22:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] city_landlocked_sell_coastal_improvements generalisation (PR#1105), jdorje, 21:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Client core (PR#1107), jdorje, 21:20
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Client core, Paul Zastoupil, 20:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Reinier Post, 17:07
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: maxplayers abuse (PR#1103), Reinier Post, 16:21
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Reinier Post, 15:42
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Reinier Post, 15:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Reinier Post, 15:28
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] city_landlocked_sell_coastal_improvements generalisation (PR#1105), Ben Webb, 15:09
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] Improvement effect definitions (PR#1104), Ben Webb, 14:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Reinier Post, 14:21
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Ben Webb, 14:16
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Tech cost patch v14 (PR#1082), Reinier Post, 13:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] maxplayers abuse (PR#1103), schnetter, 13:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Daniel L Speyer, 13:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: maxplayers abuse (PR#1103), Stefan Schnetter, 13:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Reinier Post, 10:56
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Andrew Sutton, 09:18
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Baumans, 08:47
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Criticism, Petr Baudis, 06:36
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Tech cost patch v14 (PR#1082), Juha Litola, 04:07
• December 07, 2001
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Win32 Cygwin Binary Crashes (PR#1102), ccraciun, 21:45
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] base_real_map_distance (PR#1049), jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Indentation in switch(), pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] generalized unit capabs, ansutton@xxxxxxx, 19:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, deepone@xxxxxxxxxx, 19:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, ansutton@xxxxxxx, 19:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] generalized unit capabs, ansutton@xxxxxxx, 19:54
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] Improvement effects speedup (PR#1094), ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, ansutton@xxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), ansutton@xxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Removing much dependence on Imlib, baumans@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Sound patch v1, Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ruleset Development - improvements, ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability, gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re[2]: civ1 music?, genius_invincible_jesus@sympatico.c, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability, gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), rp@xxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Removing much dependence on Imlib, vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH: cityview unification (PR#1085), vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, ccrayne@xxxxxxxxxx, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, jpopl@xxxxxxxxxx, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Extraordinary gifts for any specicial occasion!, business_news@xxxxxxxxxx, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML (OT), Petr Baudis, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML (OT), Andrew Sutton, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Easy,Inexpensive ($5 to 5 people)Money Maker, rich_grafs, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: question, gij, 19:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] small GUI unification: decrease_unit_hp_smooth (PR#1099), jdorje, 19:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Is This Your Last Chance, jay_emery, 19:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Criticism, Raahul Kumar, 19:17
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Criticism, Ross W. Wetmore, 19:05
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Returned mail: Service unavailable (PR#1101), Mail Delivery Subsystem, 18:19
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Easy,Inexpensive ($5 to 5 people)Money Maker (PR#1100), rich_grafs, 18:19
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Easy,Inexpensive ($5 to 5 people)Money Maker, rich_grafs, 18:13
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Is This Your Last Chance, jay_emery, 14:05
  • [Freeciv-Dev] small GUI unification: decrease_unit_hp_smooth (PR#1099), jdorje, 13:36
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: question, gij, 12:43
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Easy,Inexpensive ($5 to 5 people)Money Maker, rich_grafs, 12:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML (OT), Petr Baudis, 11:47
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML (OT), Andrew Sutton, 11:35
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML, Petr Baudis, 10:00
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 08:50
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML, Andrew Sutton, 08:37
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#1098), Mike Kaufman, 08:18
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#1098), Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 08:03
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#1098), Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 08:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Overflow problems, Raahul Kumar, 07:16
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Criticism, Raahul Kumar, 07:10
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML, Petr Baudis, 05:44
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Criticism, Petr Baudis, 04:59
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv Todo, Petr Baudis, 04:55
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Jason Short, 03:18
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML, Daniel Sjölie, 02:59
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: XML, Raimar Falke, 02:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Raimar Falke, 02:46
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] convert save_options() to secfile (PR#1097), Daniel Sjölie, 01:57
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#1098), jdorje, 00:34
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Terminal left in wrong state when quitting due to gameover (PR#1077), Andreas Kemnade, 00:16
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#1098), Mike Kaufman, 00:08
• December 06, 2001
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, ccrayne, 23:58
  • [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#1098), Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 23:02
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Overflow problems, Ross W. Wetmore, 21:44
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] tile_is_known patch (again) (PR#1098), jdorje, 19:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Criticism, Raahul Kumar, 19:38
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] tile_is_known patch (again) (PR#1098), Mike Kaufman, 19:24
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] tile_is_known patch (again), Mike Kaufman, 19:24
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, Raahul Kumar, 19:23
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] convert save_options() to secfile (PR#1097), Mike Kaufman, 19:20
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] convert save_options() to secfile, Mike Kaufman, 19:20
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Overflow problems, Raahul Kumar, 19:19
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Freeciv Todo, Raahul Kumar, 19:17
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: question, Greg Wooledge, 18:44
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Terminal left in wrong state when quitting due to gameover (PR#1077), jdorje, 17:14
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Ross W. Wetmore, 16:56
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Jason Short, 16:47
  • [Freeciv-Dev] question, Mirko Hufnagel, 16:37
  • [Freeciv-Dev] XML, Per I. Mathisen, 16:37
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Per I. Mathisen, 16:24
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Re[2]: civ1 music?, Petr Baudis, 16:20
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] add worklist notifier to citydlg (PR#1096), Mike Kaufman, 16:18
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] add worklist notifier to citydlg, Mike Kaufman, 16:18
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Re[2]: civ1 music?, Per I. Mathisen, 16:13
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: settlers & players territory, Petr Baudis, 15:25
  • [Freeciv-Dev] settlers & players territory, mateusz stefek, 15:09
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Daniel L Speyer, 14:39
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Raimar Falke, 14:33
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Daniel L Speyer, 14:13
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Terminal left in wrong state when quitting due to gameover (PR#1077), Thue, 13:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Raimar Falke, 13:19
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Jules Bean, 12:10
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Jules Bean, 11:56
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Jules Bean, 11:50
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 10:41
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Daniel L Speyer, 10:21
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Andrew Sutton, 08:05
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Andrew Sutton, 08:04
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] base_real_map_distance (PR#1049), Raahul Kumar, 07:16
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Petr Baudis, 05:04
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Jules Bean, 04:59
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Jules Bean, 04:57
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Petr Baudis, 04:46
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Remove trailing newlines, Raimar Falke, 04:44
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, Petr Baudis, 04:30
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Gregor Zeitlinger, 04:16
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Gregor Zeitlinger, 04:10
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sound patch v1, Daniel Sjölie, 03:39
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sound patch v1, Per I. Mathisen, 03:24
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sound patch v1, Per I. Mathisen, 03:13
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sound patch v1, Daniel Sjölie, 03:08
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sound patch v1, Raimar Falke, 02:27
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Raimar Falke, 02:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Raimar Falke, 02:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Petrus Viljoen, 02:08
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Removing much dependence on Imlib, Raimar Falke, 02:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Raimar Falke, 01:59
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Raimar Falke, 01:48
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Jules Bean, 01:36
  • [Freeciv-Dev] SHCC: National Sales Expansion Position Company for Rapid Growth DXSNWCEID, InewsAlert20, 00:54
• December 05, 2001
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Mike Kaufman, 23:10
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Mike Kaufman, 23:02
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Business Proposal, atomesanathan, 21:28
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Business Proposal, atomesanathan, 21:24
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Cleaning up gotohand.c (PR#1068), Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] base_real_map_distance (PR#1049), Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Cleaning up gotohand.c (PR#1068), Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: buglet in normalization in init_new_game() (PR#1063), Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, Ross W. Wetmore, 21:01
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [광고]MBC아카데미무비잉글리쉬입니다, 신태수, 19:51
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Jason Short, 19:38
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 19:27
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 19:13
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Extraordinary gifts for any specicial occasion!, Business News, 19:13
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, Jacek Popławski, 19:12
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: AI strategy, ccrayne, 18:58
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 18:56
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: PATCH: cityview unification (PR#1085), Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 18:21
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Removing much dependence on Imlib, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 17:55
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Gregor Zeitlinger, 17:31
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Reinier Post, 17:28
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Gregor Zeitlinger, 17:14
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re[2]: civ1 music?, gij, 17:07
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development], Gregor Zeitlinger, 17:03
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Jules Bean, 16:00
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Jules Bean, 16:00
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ruleset Development - improvements, Ben Webb, 15:48
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Sound patch v1, Per I. Mathisen, 15:46
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Removing much dependence on Imlib, John Bauman, 15:43
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Andrew Sutton, 15:09
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Petr Baudis, 15:05
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Raimar Falke, 14:52
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Andrew Sutton, 14:36
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Jules Bean, 14:32
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] Improvement effects speedup (PR#1094), Ben Webb, 14:17
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Jason Short, 14:14
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] generalized unit capabs, Andrew Sutton, 14:07
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Andrew Sutton, 13:55
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Daniel Sjölie, 13:45
  • [Freeciv-Dev] [PATCH] generalized unit capabs, Andrew Sutton, 13:34
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Petr Baudis, 13:25
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Indentation in switch(), Petr Baudis, 13:18
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] base_real_map_distance (PR#1049), Jason Short, 13:11
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Andrew Sutton, 13:07
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Raimar Falke, 13:06
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: generalized unit capabilities, Andrew Sutton, 12:52