Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Jules Bean <jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:46:43 +0100

Dear diary, on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:35:40AM CET, I got a letter, where Jules
Bean <jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> told me, that...
> If I wanted to define a format for arbitrary structured data, I'd make it
> much more like the 'C-like' example earlier in this thread. But now that
> there *is* a standard, there are some advantages to using it.
If you are still talking about easy modifiability, that C-like format is easy
to modify in probably anything and I seriously can't think about anything
easier ;) (even XML mode of emacs - <noflame>altough I never tried it as I just
find emacs itself too hard to control for me so I don't have it even installed,
sorry</noflame>[uh, that xml is not so bad ;]).

About that easy verifiability, it's C-like, not C syntax. You won't be able to
verify it by C compiler probably, but it's really easy to make dummy wrapper to
your parser to verify the corectness of syntax.

-- 

                                Petr "Pasky" Baudis

UN*X programmer, UN*X administrator, hobbies = IPv6, IRC, FreeCiv hacking
.
  "A common mistake that people make, when trying to design
   something completely foolproof is to underestimate the
   ingenuity of complete fools."
     -- Douglas Adams in Mostly Harmless
.
Public PGP key, geekcode and stuff: http://pasky.ji.cz/~pasky/


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]