Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability
From: "gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, 05 Dec 2001 20:21:54 -500

Originally to: David Bryan Smith

  by provide.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b5)
  with ESMTP id 6276036 for 
dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 
18:14:35 -0500
Received: from pi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP
        id EB3913B93B; Wed,  5 Dec 2001 18:14:12 
-0500 (EST)
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 
freeciv-dev); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:14:12 -0500 
(EST)
Delivered-To: 
virtual-freeciv.org-freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de 
(sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de 
[141.20.20.51])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP id 7A6BD3B851
        for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,  5 Dec 
2001 18:14:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de 
(mitte [141.20.21.141])
        by sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de 
(8.11.3/8.11.3/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.8) with 
ESMTP id fB5NCW411135
        for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 6 Dec 
2001 00:12:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (zeitling@localhost)
        by mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de 
(8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA27272
        for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 6 Dec 
2001 00:12:32 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: 
mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de: zeitling owned 
process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:12:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Gregor Zeitlinger 
<zeitling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: freeciv development list 
<freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development 
Strategies [Was Documentation,
 Usability and  Development]
In-Reply-To: 

20011205105703.A5518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: 




























0.26327-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 5112
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: 
zeitling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-list: freeciv-dev

On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Raimar Falke wrote:
> So what do you think about this plan:
>  1) implement the improvement effects which 
now the ruleset advertises
>  but aren't implemented
>  2) do something similar to units
sorry, but not too much. If I'd develop a 
ruleset I'd come up with many
featues that are guaranteed to be not 
implemented and I can't if I don't
want to modify the C source code - which I 
may not even want if it's
experimental. I still want do be able to 
easily distribute it as a config
file.

-- 
Gregor Zeitlinger      
gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]