[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Originally to: David Bryan Smith
by provide.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b5)
with ESMTP id 6276036 for
dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 05 Dec 2001
18:14:35 -0500
Received: from pi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP
id EB3913B93B; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:14:12
-0500 (EST)
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list
freeciv-dev); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:14:12 -0500
(EST)
Delivered-To:
virtual-freeciv.org-freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de
[141.20.20.51])
by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7A6BD3B851
for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 5 Dec
2001 18:14:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(mitte [141.20.21.141])
by sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(8.11.3/8.11.3/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.8) with
ESMTP id fB5NCW411135
for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 6 Dec
2001 00:12:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (zeitling@localhost)
by mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA27272
for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 6 Dec
2001 00:12:32 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning:
mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de: zeitling owned
process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:12:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Gregor Zeitlinger
<zeitling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: freeciv development list
<freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development
Strategies [Was Documentation,
Usability and Development]
In-Reply-To:
20011205105703.A5518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
0.26327-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 5112
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender:
zeitling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-list: freeciv-dev
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Raimar Falke wrote:
> So what do you think about this plan:
> 1) implement the improvement effects which
now the ruleset advertises
> but aren't implemented
> 2) do something similar to units
sorry, but not too much. If I'd develop a
ruleset I'd come up with many
featues that are guaranteed to be not
implemented and I can't if I don't
want to modify the C source code - which I
may not even want if it's
experimental. I still want do be able to
easily distribute it as a config
file.
--
Gregor Zeitlinger
gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability,
gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <=
|
|