Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)
From: "rp@xxxxxxxxxx" <dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, 05 Dec 2001 20:22:04 -500

Originally to: David Bryan Smith

  by provide.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b5)
  with ESMTP id 6277024 for 
dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 
18:28:57 -0500
Received: from pi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP
        id 9832C3B93E; Wed,  5 Dec 2001 18:28:18 
-0500 (EST)
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 
freeciv-dev); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:28:18 -0500 
(EST)
Delivered-To: 
virtual-freeciv.org-freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from mailhost.tue.nl 
(mailhost.tue.nl [131.155.2.5])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP id 9329E3B93D
        for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,  5 Dec 
2001 18:28:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from svis02.win.tue.nl 
(svis02.win.tue.nl [131.155.70.172])
        by mailhost.tue.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) with 
ESMTP id fB5NSGx12736
        for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 6 Dec 
2001 00:28:16 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from rp@localhost)
        by svis02.win.tue.nl (8.11.0/8.11.1) id 
fB5NSFJ20330
        for freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 
00:28:15 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:28:15 +0100
From: Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want 
to work on the ~ (was: registry)
Message-ID: 
<20011206002815.D20131@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-Followup-To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: 
<E16BcSO-0000lK-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 




11205203015.A11643@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<20011205210522.GP19852@xxxxxxxxxxx> 

E16BjIM-0003Rt-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<1007589615.4594.2.camel@pear>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <1007589615.4594.2.camel@pear>; 
from jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Dec 05, 
2001 at 10:00:15PM +0000
X-archive-position: 5113
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: rp@xxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-list: freeciv-dev

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:00:15PM +0000, 
Jules Bean wrote:

> Any right-thinking person realises that XML 
is far from a panacea, and
> is horribly over-hyped.
> 
> On the other hand (and rather sadly) one of 
XML's advantages is simply
> its ubiquity.

And this was exactly the point of XML: to 
have a single notation for
structured data so you'd never have to write 
your own parsers, converters
and all the rest of that again.

Agreed, it's too verbose, but that also 
depends on the DTD.

A C syntax is more concise and it can be 
validated by the C compiler ...

-- 
Reinier



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]