[Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Originally to: David Bryan Smith
by provide.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b5)
with ESMTP id 6285911 for
dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 05 Dec 2001
20:27:34 -0500
Received: from pi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP
id 69D113B945; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:27:19
-0500 (EST)
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list
freeciv-dev); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 20:27:19 -0500
(EST)
Delivered-To:
virtual-freeciv.org-freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from mega.ist.utl.pt
(mega.ist.utl.pt [193.136.128.20])
by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 02F703B944
for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 5 Dec
2001 20:27:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mega.ist.utl.pt (Postfix, from
userid 42786)
id 27FD711DF2F; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 01:24:19
+0000 (WET)
Received: from localhost (localhost
[127.0.0.1])
by mega.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id
25BE711ADDF
for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 6 Dec
2001 01:24:19 +0000 (WET)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 01:24:19 +0000 (WET)
From: Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa
<vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: vasc@mega
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want
to work on the ~ (was:
registry)
In-Reply-To: <1007589458.4594.0.camel@pear>
Message-ID:
ne.GSO.4.05.10112060121080.10343-100000@mega>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 5122
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-list: freeciv-dev
On 5 Dec 2001, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 20:52, Raimar Falke
wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:30:15PM +0000,
Jules Bean wrote:
> > > Writing your own parser is error-prone
> >
> > Not with flex+bison.
>
> Different kind of error. You can still
make logical errors even using
> flex+bison. (You can still make logical
errors using libxml, of course;
> I was just suggesting it's easier with a
library).
Bah. Using flex+bison is easy as pie! :-)
> > > Alternatively, there may be
standardised forms of the above. Doesn't
> > > the stuff libproplist uses look a bit
like that?
> >
> > I couldn't find an online docu in the
first 30 matches of google. This
> > doesn't speak for the library.
> Neither could I, or I would have posted the
link ;-)
>
> In any case, I'm not a freeciv developer,
so it's not my decision :)
LibPropList comes with windowmaker. Its
basically a C library that allows
you to read some NeXTStep config file format.
Or should i say, used LibPropList, they
removed it in favour of WINGs in
0.70.0.
---
Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto
Superior Tecnico, Lisboa
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry),
vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2001/12/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), rp@xxxxxxxxxx, 2001/12/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), ansutton@xxxxxxx, 2001/12/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2001/12/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2001/12/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2001/12/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2001/12/07
|
|