[Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)

["ansutton@xxxxxxx" <dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Originally to: David Bryan Smith

  by provide.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b5)
  with ESMTP id 6266055 for 
dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 
16:10:12 -0500
Received: from pi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP
        id 7E7B13BA8F; Wed,  5 Dec 2001 16:09:41 
-0500 (EST)
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 
freeciv-dev); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:09:41 -0500 
(EST)
Delivered-To: 
virtual-freeciv.org-freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net 
(mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP id 2ADDF3B853
        for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,  5 Dec 
2001 16:09:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 
user-2injgmj.dsl.mindspring.com 
([165.121.194.211] helo=there)
        by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with smtp 
(Exim 3.33 #1)
        id 16BjIM-0003Rt-00; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 
16:09:34 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Andrew Sutton <ansutton@xxxxxxx>
Organization: Software Emgineering Pros.
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
        Jules Bean <jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want 
to work on the ~ (was: registry)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:02:55 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: 
<E16BcSO-0000lK-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 




11205203015.A11643@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<20011205210522.GP19852@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: 
<20011205210522.GP19852@xxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: 

E16BjIM-0003Rt-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-archive-position: 5104
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: ansutton@xxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-list: freeciv-dev

On Wednesday 05 December 2001 04:05 pm, Petr 
Baudis wrote:
> Excessively verbose I would say. I just 
don't think XML is good for
> everything. This is not the case where XML 
would give any huge benefit.

oh my god! somebody shares my view of XML? 
its wonder ;)

andy