[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Originally to: David Bryan Smith
by provide.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b5)
with ESMTP id 6275282 for
dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 05 Dec 2001
18:05:56 -0500
Received: from pi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP
id 4E1303B85A; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:03:58
-0500 (EST)
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list
freeciv-dev); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:03:58 -0500
(EST)
Delivered-To:
virtual-freeciv.org-freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de
[141.20.20.51])
by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP id C4E043B851
for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 5 Dec
2001 18:03:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(mitte [141.20.21.141])
by sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(8.11.3/8.11.3/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.8) with
ESMTP id fB5N3i410829;
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:03:44 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (zeitling@localhost)
by mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de
(8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA27228;
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:03:44 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning:
mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de: zeitling owned
process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:03:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Gregor Zeitlinger
<zeitling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv development list
<freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development
Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and
Development]
In-Reply-To:
<20011205023808.GE19852@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
0.26327-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 5110
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender:
zeitling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-list: freeciv-dev
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Please wake up, we already agreed that
freeciv2 as proposed is not going
> to succeed, so replying to already closed
discussion has no point at all
> IMHO. ;-) Just my two cents you may not
take if you don't want to.
Well, I hadn't gotten that far and secondly
I'm not entirely convinced
your position is the majority position
because there hasn't been voting.
As I mentioned before one of the reasons I am
in favor is that I'm looking
for a good piece of software to start with
the 18xx software and what andy
has mentioned was pretty much the
requirements for that project.
--
Gregor Zeitlinger
gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|