Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?
From: "Per I. Mathisen" <Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:02:35 +0100 (MET)

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Mike Jing wrote:
> > > visible on the map.  Also, civil war should be dropped as losing your
> > > capital is enough of a blow in itself.  Also, if you lose your captical
...
> In the sense that as your first city, the capital is probably a well
> developed city (not that any city is that well developed in a typical
> smallpox game) and thus quite important even without the threat of civil
> war.

It adds another tactical dimension to the game, so it is good, IMHO. If it
is important, then protect it! It is one of the few ways in which a much
city-number inferior opponent can win by superior tactics.

Yours,
Per

"It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education."
 -- Albert  Einstein




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]