[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Mike Jing wrote:
> > > visible on the map. Also, civil war should be dropped as losing your
> > > capital is enough of a blow in itself. Also, if you lose your captical
...
> In the sense that as your first city, the capital is probably a well
> developed city (not that any city is that well developed in a typical
> smallpox game) and thus quite important even without the threat of civil
> war.
It adds another tactical dimension to the game, so it is good, IMHO. If it
is important, then protect it! It is one of the few ways in which a much
city-number inferior opponent can win by superior tactics.
Yours,
Per
"It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education."
-- Albert Einstein
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Jason Short, 2001/12/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Jason Short, 2001/12/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Paul Zastoupil, 2001/12/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Raimar Falke, 2001/12/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Takacs Gabor, 2001/12/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Reinier Post, 2001/12/12
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Takacs Gabor, 2001/12/12
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 2001/12/10
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 2001/12/11
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 2001/12/11
|
|