[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Jason Short <vze2zq63@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can't you just not categorize the cities? If you leave them all under the
"cities" entry, I imagine the behavior will be the same as before.
That's why I didn't speak up against it earlier as it looked to be optional.
I just think it is not worth the effort since the random map in the game
bears little resemblence to the real world geography anyway. It's like the
patch which adds national currency names. Cute, yes. But IMHO it adds
little to the game.
Really, this patch to the code doesn't change behavior _at all_, it just
introduces a new feature into the rulesets. Only when the rulesets are
changed will the behavior of the game change. So if you want this not to
happen, you should (IMO) be talking to the ruleset writers.
To be fair, it is not that much of a big deal as it's not a gameplay issue.
So if some people like to see it, then why not. Although it looks like
Unnecessary Complexity (TM) to me.
Mike
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, (continued)
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 2001/12/10
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?, Mike Jing, 2001/12/11
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Is the city names patch good?,
Mike Jing <=
|
|