Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ruleset Development - improvements
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ruleset Development - improvements

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ruleset Development - improvements
From: "ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, 05 Dec 2001 20:21:14 -500

Originally to: David Bryan Smith

  by provide.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b5)
  with ESMTP id 6269970 for 
dbsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 
16:57:09 -0500
Received: from pi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP
        id 348A53B9F6; Wed,  5 Dec 2001 16:48:36 
-0500 (EST)
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list 
freeciv-dev); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:48:36 -0500 
(EST)
Delivered-To: 
virtual-freeciv.org-freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from bellatrix.pcl.ox.ac.uk 
(bellatrix.pcl.ox.ac.uk [163.1.35.134])
        by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) 
with ESMTP id E85503B939
        for <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,  5 Dec 
2001 16:48:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (ben@localhost)
        by bellatrix.pcl.ox.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) 
with ESMTP id fB5LmP108849;
        Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:48:25 GMT
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:48:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ben Webb <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Freeciv List <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ruleset 
Development - improvements
In-Reply-To: <3C0D4DDD.70508@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: 



















052146120.8258-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 5107
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: freeciv-dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-list: freeciv-dev

On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 vze2zq63@xxxxxxxxxxx 
wrote:

> Ben Webb wrote:
> >     An additional problem/feature is that 
you (the client) may think 
> > that you control two islands, but 
(because of unexplored land connecting 
> > the two land areas) they are actually 
just one island. The server knows 
> > this, of course, and thus the effect of a 
continent-specific improvement 
> > will be different for the server and 
client.
> 
> When you think about this logically, it's 
pretty rediculous.  Consider 
> that you have hoover dam built, which 
provides hydro power to every city 
> on the continent.  If you haven't even 
explored enough to know that two 
> cities are on the same continent at all, 
how is this supposed to happen?

        Agreed. I suspect this is why the default 
Freeciv ruleset doesn't 
have this kind of effect for the Hoover Dam 
any more (it affects _all_ of 
your cities instead).

> Anyway, although this could provide the 
"correct" solution I don't think 
> it's worth it.  I think, rather, the better 
solution is that the server 
> provide the client with a list of 
additional effects on each city 
> (which, I believe, is whar Raimar said was 
needed for CMA's as well).

Again, I agree. For the time being I'm 
overlooking the situation, however.

        Ben
-- 
ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx           
http://bellatrix.pcl.ox.ac.uk/~ben/
"Excellent!" I [Dr Watson] cried. 
"Elementary," said he [Holmes].
        - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]