[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> All this talk about 2.0 has made me think that we ought to release a
> 1.12.1.
I suggest we do a Stallman and drop the major revision number. Freeciv
grows by increments, so a major revision number makes no sense. That way
next release gets to be "Freeciv 13". Simple as it gets.
What should be in 13? As far as I can see the major parts are
- win32 port (Andreas)
- CMA (Raimar?)
- sound support (me)
- fix improvements rulesets (Ben? anyone?); we shouldn't publish
something we know to be broken
I can probably be ready with the sounds stuff for over xmas. Andreas K
said he is almost finished with win32 port. CMA I think has a bit to go?
Improvements rulesets probably the worst of the four...
Any takers?
Yours,
Per
"It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education."
-- Albert Einstein
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Daniel Sjölie, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Andrew Sutton, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Jules Bean, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Daniel Sjölie, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Andrew Sutton, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Jason Short, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Andrew Sutton, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Petrus Viljoen, 2001/12/06
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Reinier Post, 2001/12/08
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Andreas Kemnade, 2001/12/05
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?,
Per I. Mathisen <=
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv 1.12.1 spec?, Jason Short, 2001/12/06
|
|