Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability a
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability a

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Daniel L Speyer <dspeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jules Bean <jules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gregor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Development Strategies [Was Documentation, Usability and Development]
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:33:39 +0100
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:13:39PM -0500, Daniel L Speyer wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Raimar Falke wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 05:47:41PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > > > And why should new unit powers be written in C?  The language is slower 
> > > > to
> > > > write in and much more prone to bugs (no array checking, have to do
> > > > pointers manually...).  Now C does have its performance advantages, but
> > > > how often will this code be called (especially if the default units 
> > > > don't
> > > > use anything interpereted)?
> > > 
> > > Absolutely.
> > > 
> > > [snip more good reasons, which begin to be a specification of a good
> > > scripting language]
> > > 
> > > Oh yes.  I don't claim that a freeciv with scriptable units and
> > > improvements wouldn't be a fantabulously excellent toy.  On the
> > > contrary, it would be "Awesome, Dude!".
> > 
> > > All I'm saying is that the rigid framework approach is much easier to
> > > program and think out, and may be acheivable in a much shorter
> > > timespan and still be interesting.
> > 
> > Ack. And not hackable.
> 
> That's part of the point: freeciv should be hackable.
> 
> Remeber the amount of anger when the Aibo's manufacturer tried to stop
> people from hacking that?  Why should freeciv take the same
> philosophy?  The best hacks can become part of the mainstream game and
> inspire new developements.  Hacking is a *good thing*.
> 
> If you're worried about abuses, I really don't think it's that big a
> deal.  There's nothing to stop multiple logons presently, but I haven't
> seen anybody doing it.  I think most players know that if someone who
> T4L1<Z Li1<3 Th1Z wants to use a long, obfuscated ruleset, they should be
> suspicious.

I agree that there may be not hard border. Think about the fact the
people name all there cities "2". Is this a cheat, a hack or just some
annoying behavior.

And long and obfuscated is very relative.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "I heard if you play the NT-4.0-CD backwards, you get a satanic message."
 "That's nothing, if you play it forward, it installs NT-4.0"


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]