[Freeciv] Re: RFE: terrain improvement: canal

[nicholas.g.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

freeciv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 14/01/2006 12:24:48 PM:

> Jason Dorje Short wrote:
> >There would have to be good justification for a change like this.  What
> >gameplay benefit would having canals provide?
> >
> >-jason
> >
> It can be really annoying to have a huge peninsula, or continent
> (Denmark, South America, Africa) to go around when you could just change
> two squares to canal. Depending on how large the detour was, you could
> halve the time for reinforcements to reach the enemy (always a good
thing).

Considering the vast amount of infrastructure required for a
canal that can handle the largest sea-going vessels...

Why not use a string of cities? Sea-going vessels can already
move into a city (by entering the harbour). What if a sea-going
vessel could move from the harbour of one city into the
harbour of a city in an adjacent square?

nick


************************************************************
Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads,
Queensland Transport or Maritime Safety Queensland, or
endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
If you have received this electronic mail message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete the message
from your computer.
************************************************************