[Freeciv] Re: Some questions
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Mike Jing wrote:
> You are absolutely correct, of course. It is still possible to completely
> ignore one particular branch of the tech tree under this system, although it
> does delay the discovery of your immediate goal to a certain degree. It
> effectly slows down the research somewhat, which I think is a good thing,
> but I do agree it is not very effective in broadening the width of your
> research.
I noticed when designing my modpack that there were some advancements that
should reasonably require more than two prereqs. If multiple prereqs were
supported, that would provide a mechanism for slowing down deep progress, if
someone decided to do that by means of a modpack.
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
- [Freeciv] Re: the struggle against city smallpox (was: Some questions), (continued)
- [Freeciv] Re: the struggle against city smallpox (was: Some questions), Massimo Campostrini, 2000/12/21
- [Freeciv] Re: the struggle against city smallpox (was: Some questions), Paul Dean, 2000/12/21
- [Freeciv] Re: the struggle against city smallpox (was: Some questions), Thue, 2000/12/21
- [Freeciv] Re: the struggle against city smallpox (was: Some questions), Nathan Lovell, 2000/12/21
- [Freeciv] Re: the struggle against city smallpox (was: Some questions), Bevan Broun, 2000/12/21
- [Freeciv] Re: the struggle against city smallpox (was: Some questions), Reinier Post, 2000/12/22
[Freeciv] Re: Some questions, Mike Jing, 2000/12/19
- [Freeciv] Re: Some questions,
Bobby D. Bryant <=
[Freeciv] Re: Some questions, Mike Jing, 2000/12/19
[Freeciv] Re: Some questions, Mike Jing, 2000/12/25
[Freeciv] Re: Some questions, Mike Jing, 2000/12/25
[Freeciv] Re: Some questions, Mike Jing, 2000/12/25
|
|