Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2006:
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#15446) undesirable rulers
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#15446) undesirable rulers

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#15446) undesirable rulers
From: "Daniel Markstedt" <himasaram@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:48:14 -0800
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=15446 >

> [evyscr - Thu Feb 16 10:46:19 2006]:
> 
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:50:06 -0800
> Christian Knoke <chrisk AT cknoke.de> wrote:
> > Egor Vyscrebentsov wrote on Feb 16, 00:51 (-0800):
> > > Jason Short <jdorje AT users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > <skip/>
> > > > Now, on this topic, what about Stalin?  He has already been
> removed from
> > > > the Russian ruleset and added to the Soviet one.  How do we
> resolve this
> > > > with keeping Hitler in the German ruleset?  The Soviet Union was
> no less
> > > > the same as the Russian nation than nazi germany was part of
> historical
> > > > Germany.
> > >
> > > 0. My wish was to add soviet nation, and I will strongly against
> removing it.
> > > (Yeah, I'm soviet ;) One of the reason is WW2 scenarios.
> >
> > Soviet should stay, yes. What does 'transitional' mean?
> 
> Hm, there was a discussion about this name earlier. But we can ask
> Daniel again ;)
> 

It's a nation that once existed as a distinct entity during a
transitional period, but is now an integral part/parts of other nations.
It's vague by purpose.

Other nations we could fit in here are for example Yugoslavia or South
Vietnam.

-Daniel



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]