[aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> I am really becoming amazed to see how many liberals there are in this
> club. Am I the only conservative in this group?
No you are not the only conservative on the list. In reading the posts i=
t=20
became obvious that there are probably better things to do than to try an=
d=20
argue with people whose positions are held so tightly that there is no=20
arguing with them. That goes for both sides of this argument -- I doubt =
they=20
could convince me of the moral or factual correctness of their viewpoint =
even=20
if they knew me personally, let alone over an email list. I doubt I coul=
d=20
present a case that would make them turn a 180 and head in my direction.
The last few posts have proven the truth of that to my satisfaction, if n=
o one=20
else.
Luckily, I am part of this list because I have an intense interest in Lin=
ux,=20
use it at home, and generally like the people who have that same interest=
=2E I=20
can agree to disagree on this point, yet still appreciate some of the oth=
er=20
discussions, and of course any technical viewpoints held by the others on=
=20
this list. They can attempt to persuade people who have not made up thei=
r=20
minds on the various matters (hey, even the assasination of JFK for all I=
=20
care) as can I.
I do not believe that they are members of the Nazi party or would be if t=
hey=20
could, nor do I believe that they are members of the Communist party, to =
get=20
closer to the totalitarian viewpoint on that side of the aisle. I regret=
=20
that they can not believe something to that affect about conservatives.
But then again -- they don't know me personally. Well...most of them :).
Scott Rarden
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Jeff Vian, 2003/02/04
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, flimzy, 2003/02/04
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Lowell Premer, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid,
Scott Rarden <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] no-so-much Richard Reid (was Re: Richard Reid), gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: no-so-much Richard Reid (was Re: Richard Reid), John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/03
|
|