[aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
>>>Give me a break, Jon. Don't you ever read any of you own posts. You
>>>can come across pretty course.
>>>
>>>You have came out yelling "you're wrong" to the opposition without any
>>>due reason. So, don't play that whollier than thou game with me.
>>>
>>>Like the time you told a person they were wrong, they weren't using
>>>Linux back then becuase you said it hadn't been invented yet. What
>>>year did you say Linus released it again? You could have at least
>>>appaulizied (sp) for calling him a lier. Truth hurts doesn't it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I'm not sure what you're talking about. Perhaps you could cite a
>>source (i.e. provide evidence) to back this claim of yours?
>
> It's just my opinion that you are short/course with people, when you
> think your right.
>
> As for the Linux records. If you really need yor evidence go back and
> look in the archives..... You made that false statement approx. one
> month before you saw the OS Revolution movie.
I don't know what the OS Rev movie has to do with anything. But then, I
still don't have the foggiest idea what you're talking about.
And since I don't know what supposed statement I made that you think was
wrong or course (sic), I can neither defend myself, nor admit wrongdoing.
If you feel like looking through the archives to find the statement in
question, I would be more than happy to respond. If you're not willing to
go to that effort, then I suggest that out of fairness, you stop making
low-blows at people.
> Furthermore, what do you want? From this day foreward do you want me
> to gather evidence of every time you say "Your Wrong", or you holler
> or are rood? That would be a long list.
What I want is an end to personal attacks. "You're wrong!" almost
inevitably comes across as a personal attack. "I believe you are wrong
because XYZ suggests as much," on the other hand comes across entirely
different.
-- Jonathan
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, bruce, 2003/02/01
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/01
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Larry Bottorff, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Osten, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Jonathan Hall, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, flimzy, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid,
flimzy <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Jeff Vian, 2003/02/04
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, flimzy, 2003/02/04
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Lowell Premer, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Scott Rarden, 2003/02/02
|
|