[aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
flimzy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>Give me a break, Jon. Don't you ever read any of you own posts. You
>>>>can come across pretty course.
>>>>
>>>>You have came out yelling "you're wrong" to the opposition without any
>>>>due reason. So, don't play that whollier than thou game with me.
>>>>
>>>>Like the time you told a person they were wrong, they weren't using
>>>>Linux back then becuase you said it hadn't been invented yet. What
>>>>year did you say Linus released it again? You could have at least
>>>>appaulizied (sp) for calling him a lier. Truth hurts doesn't it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I'm not sure what you're talking about. Perhaps you could cite a
>>>source (i.e. provide evidence) to back this claim of yours?
>>>
>>>
>>It's just my opinion that you are short/course with people, when you
>>think your right.
>>
>>As for the Linux records. If you really need yor evidence go back and
>>look in the archives..... You made that false statement approx. one
>>month before you saw the OS Revolution movie.
>>
>>
>
>I don't know what the OS Rev movie has to do with anything. But then, I
>still don't have the foggiest idea what you're talking about.
>And since I don't know what supposed statement I made that you think was
>wrong or course (sic), I can neither defend myself, nor admit wrongdoing.
>If you feel like looking through the archives to find the statement in
>question, I would be more than happy to respond. If you're not willing to
>go to that effort, then I suggest that out of fairness, you stop making
>low-blows at people.
>
>
What does fairness have to do with anything. When you stop the
low-blows then so will I.
>
>
>>Furthermore, what do you want? From this day foreward do you want me
>>to gather evidence of every time you say "Your Wrong", or you holler
>>or are rood? That would be a long list.
>>
>>
>
>What I want is an end to personal attacks. "You're wrong!" almost
>inevitably comes across as a personal attack. "I believe you are wrong
>because XYZ suggests as much," on the other hand comes across entirely
>different.
>-- Jonathan
>
>
>
>-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
>visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
>
>
>
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/01
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Larry Bottorff, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Osten, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Jonathan Hall, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, flimzy, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, flimzy, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid,
Michael Moore <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/03
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Jeff Vian, 2003/02/04
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, flimzy, 2003/02/04
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, John Goerzen, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Lowell Premer, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Scott Rarden, 2003/02/02
- [aclug-L] Re: Richard Reid, Michael Moore, 2003/02/02
|
|