Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9818) Inland lakes and borders
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9818) Inland lakes and borders

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9818) Inland lakes and borders
From: "Mateusz Stefek" <mstefek@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:24:11 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9818 >

> [jdorje - Thu Aug 26 22:16:32 2004]:
> 
> Mateusz Stefek wrote:
> 
> > Look at:
> > http://freeciv.org/~matusik/border-questions.png
> > The tile beetwen Stockholm and Roma needs an owner.
> 
> Under the current method it should be owned by the older of the two
cities.
I'm talking here about the general idea of claiming ocean tiles.

> > The Transport near Milano should be considered agressive
> 
> So that tile should be owned by Milano?

Yes, we can draw clear border on the inland lake.
 
> > Transporter which is half way from Linkoping to Norrkoping shouldn't
> > case unhappiness (IMHO)
> 
> Transporters don't cause unhappiness.  But I understand what you mean. 
> This is the inland lake case.
> 
> > I think I will raise MAXIMUM_CLAIMED_OCEAN_SIZE to 20
> > 
> > RT corrupted the savegame I sent earlier. Here are screenshots:
> > http://freeciv.org/~matusik/old-borders.png
> > http://freeciv.org/~matusik/new-borders.png
> 
> Try http://rt.freeciv.org:8008/.  This is supposed to be fixed.

But will those tickets be merged? Or is it completely seperate system.

> jason
--
mateusz


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]