Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9818) Inland lakes and borders

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9818) Inland lakes and borders

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9818) Inland lakes and borders
From: "Mateusz Stefek" <mstefek@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:10:45 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

First of all, I have to admit that claiming inland lakes doesn't affect
gameplay much. But:
- Small unclaimed lakes look stupid
- Oceans should generally be claimed, because players want to protect
theirs' cities, but if all ocean tiles were claimed it would be
difficult to travel by sea. (I think it was the main reason we decided
not to claim ocean tiles).
However, if we are talking about small lakes, this argument doesn't apply.

Look at:
The tile beetwen Stockholm and Roma needs an owner.
The Transport near Milano should be considered agressive
Transporter which is half way from Linkoping to Norrkoping shouldn't
case unhappiness (IMHO)

I think I will raise MAXIMUM_CLAIMED_OCEAN_SIZE to 20

RT corrupted the savegame I sent earlier. Here are screenshots:

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]