Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Michael Suess <mai99dsr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing
From: Daniel L Speyer <dspeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:55:36 -0500 (EST)

On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Michael Suess wrote:

> Am 2002.03.08 14:29:34 +0100 schrieb(en) Daniel L Speyer:
> [...]
> > Actually, this sounds like the same bug that several others have
> > reported.  The most useful debugging information you could give would be
> > whether this works with version 10 of the patch (freeciv-test inclues
> > version 8), but I don't have an appropriate diff available yet.
> > 
> > If you have time, try downloading the current cvs and the seperate conndlg
> > patch and testing those together (if it doesn't apply cleanly, which I
> > vaguely remember, try getting the January 26th snapshot, which is what I
> > diffed it off.
> I did. Like you said it doesnt apply cleanly to current cvs. However, I could
> not even get it to apply to the CVS snapshot of Jan. the 26th, this is what I
> got (the interesting part at least, contact me if more is needed):

OK, try this version, which should apply cleanly against the current
CVS.  It has a few minor bugfixes in it as well.

--Daniel Speyer
If you *don't* consider sharing information to be morally equivalent to 
kidnapping and murder on the high seas, you probably shouldn't use the
phrase "software piracy."

> command: patch -p1 < conndlg10.patch 
> response: [snip - several applied hunks]
> patch: **** malformed patch at line 867: diff -r -u
> freeciv-01-26-02/ freeciv
> I dont know the patch utility that well, so I did not try to reformat your
> patch...
> Michael Suess

Attachment: conndlg11.patch.gz
Description: Binary data

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]