Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Daniel L Speyer <dspeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing
From: Michael Suess <mai99dsr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 23:38:21 +0100

Am 2002.03.08 14:29:34 +0100 schrieb(en) Daniel L Speyer:
> Actually, this sounds like the same bug that several others have
> reported.  The most useful debugging information you could give would be
> whether this works with version 10 of the patch (freeciv-test inclues
> version 8), but I don't have an appropriate diff available yet.
> If you have time, try downloading the current cvs and the seperate conndlg
> patch and testing those together (if it doesn't apply cleanly, which I
> vaguely remember, try getting the January 26th snapshot, which is what I
> diffed it off.

I did. Like you said it doesnt apply cleanly to current cvs. However, I could
not even get it to apply to the CVS snapshot of Jan. the 26th, this is what I
got (the interesting part at least, contact me if more is needed):

command: patch -p1 < conndlg10.patch 
response: [snip - several applied hunks]
patch: **** malformed patch at line 867: diff -r -u
freeciv-01-26-02/ freeciv

I dont know the patch utility that well, so I did not try to reformat your

Michael Suess

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]