[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Am 2002.03.08 14:29:34 +0100 schrieb(en) Daniel L Speyer:
[...]
> Actually, this sounds like the same bug that several others have
> reported. The most useful debugging information you could give would be
> whether this works with version 10 of the patch (freeciv-test inclues
> version 8), but I don't have an appropriate diff available yet.
>
> If you have time, try downloading the current cvs and the seperate conndlg
> patch and testing those together (if it doesn't apply cleanly, which I
> vaguely remember, try getting the January 26th snapshot, which is what I
> diffed it off.
I did. Like you said it doesnt apply cleanly to current cvs. However, I could
not even get it to apply to the CVS snapshot of Jan. the 26th, this is what I
got (the interesting part at least, contact me if more is needed):
command: patch -p1 < conndlg10.patch
response: [snip - several applied hunks]
patch: **** malformed patch at line 867: diff -r -u
freeciv-01-26-02/configure.in freeciv
I dont know the patch utility that well, so I did not try to reformat your
patch...
Michael Suess
- [Freeciv-Dev] Another freeciv testing, mike_ml, 2002/03/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Daniel Sjölie, 2002/03/08
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Michael Süß, 2002/03/08
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Daniel L Speyer, 2002/03/08
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing,
Michael Suess <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Daniel L Speyer, 2002/03/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Michael Suess, 2002/03/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Daniel L Speyer, 2002/03/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Jason Short, 2002/03/12
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Daniel L Speyer, 2002/03/12
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Another freeciv testing, Tony Stuckey, 2002/03/08
|
|