[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
At 28-02-02 22:17 +0100, you wrote:
I don't know about Korea, but Poland and Lithuania were once the largest
nations in Europe.
You have to be very careful when talking about individual nations.
That's why I dislike the grouping idea, too.
I remember there's always been the talk of how to cope with that many
nations to choose, so the same answers keep popping up...
That leaves 'England', 'Great-Britain', 'Russia' and 'Soviet Union'.
With 'China' and 'India' if we go by population.
For me, the more nations the merrier, and to group them is just
begging for trouble.
True. Just begging for trouble, why not group them along the lines of
"militaristic", "enlightened", "more populated", "fringe powers"... and the
like? Or even let every player have their client configured to group the
tribes at their convenience, only constrained to send their choice of tribe
to the server?
My 0.01E
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Mark Metson, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog,
aliaga <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/03/01
|
|