Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Indeed, and I too am a Perl-to-Python convert.
FWIW, it appears that Perl's threads are not any better than Python's, so as
a way of solving this problem, it's probably not going to do it.
-- John
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:50:41AM -0400, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> I'll assume John's reasons for this are the same as mine: Perl is simply not
> suitable for large projects due to it's tendency to become unmaintainable. I
> know that with extensive style rules you can mitigate this somewhat, but
> Perl's syntax and There Is More Than One Way To Do It philosophy are working
> against it when scaling beyond simple programs.
>
> FOr what it is worth: I am a Perl-to-Python convert. I have worked on large
> Perl projects and I am more productive for the switch.
>
> --
> Martijn Pieters
> | Software Engineer mailto:mj@xxxxxxxx
> | Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com/
> | Creators of Zope http://www.zope.org/
> ---------------------------------------------
>
Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Jean Jordaan, 2003/07/25
Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Martijn Pieters, 2003/07/25
Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Akkana Peck, 2003/07/25
Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, John Goerzen, 2003/07/25
|
|