Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 08:47:42PM +0200, Jean Jordaan wrote:
> > What would be the best thing to do to get you personally involved with
> > writing code for OfflineIMAP?
>
> Without a doubt: keeping it in Python! And, which probably goes without
> saying, making it modular, since it would be the imaplib part of it
> that we would develop with.
I was going to quibble with this until I saw your s/making/keeping/ :-)
OK, I have heard that there are no Java defenders lurking here, so suffice
it to say I have yet to be convinced to go that way. That said, it's been
written in Python for over a year and it hasn't stirred up coders yet :-)
Incidentally, for those keeping track at home: revision 1 of OfflineIMAP
was committed on June 18, 2002, with the single file COPYING. I feel almost
slimy in a Solaris sort of way for going from 0.x to 4.x in the space of a
single year :-)
(At least OfflineIMAP doens't have 5 different version numbers all at
once...)
-- John
- Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, (continued)
- Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Jean Jordaan, 2003/07/25
- Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Martijn Pieters, 2003/07/25
- Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Akkana Peck, 2003/07/25
- Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, John Goerzen, 2003/07/25
- Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Robin Dunn, 2003/07/25
- Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Akkana Peck, 2003/07/25
Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP, Rob Holland, 2003/07/29
|
|