Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP

[Sam Clegg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 08:47:42PM +0200, Jean Jordaan wrote:
> >   What would be the best thing to do to get you personally involved with
> >   writing code for OfflineIMAP?
> 
> Without a doubt: keeping it in Python! And, which probably goes without
> saying, making it modular, since it would be the imaplib part of it
> that we would develop with.
I agree.  I've yet to find a java application for linux that I
find fast and useful.  Offlineimap is all about these two
things.  I for one find it to work perfectly for my needs.  I
have also never found a JVM package (in debian) that is a hassle
free as python or perl.

Perhaps your not attracting developers because they are all
so happy with the software already!  Its often the annoying 
bugs that draw developers to a project :)

-- 
sam clegg
:: sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/JX8xLOvxONke42kRAh1iAJsE6DyhsgP6eyu4bg3w0Qy1HYVuRQCffuRj
Iv1P1g5cJJ0zqbaWtS3cnhM=
=4pnb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----