Re: Thoughts on the future direction of OfflineIMAP

[Rob Holland <rob@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Just to throw my 2 cents in..

I found a bug which I assume is in offlineimap (although it may be due to 
imaplib.py) which has prevented me using offlineimap. I posted to this 
list, and no-one replied (everyone get ya violins out... ;).

If the code were in Perl I would dive in and have a go at debugging it. As 
its in Python I can't (even read it properly).

So, its not possible (well, feasible I suppose, as I _could_ go and learn 
python if I really wanted to try and fix this) for me to send bugfix 
patches in.

For me it would be much better if the code were in Perl.

Soo...time to try isync I suppose. Which is a shame, as everyone suggested 
I try offlineimap as its quicker and more flexible.

p.s. the above isn't a "threat" as melodramtic people like to call it, I'm 
just presenting my view :)

Regards,

Rob

--

rob@xxxxxxxx
Unix Systems Admin
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/JjgVbUBmPkWGGyIRAgh2AJ9rK1HifDseGwOP1hsEBP6x9Vu8LACg4LBL
y2+t9uCD1ws1G2+W06SyNAU=
=p4jO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----