Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Mike Kaufman <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Per I. Mathisen" <Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:41:58 +0100
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:35:18AM -0600, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> > > >  - we have to decide whether we include the stdsounds wavs in the
> > > >  normal CVS tree or in another tree or provide them as tar.gz (we have
> > > >  to decide the same (one tar with source and wavs OR one source tar
> > > >  and one sound tar) for the distribution of the release. But this
> > > >  doesn't have to happen now)
> > > 
> > > My vote is for cvs.
> I am against this, the codebase is already huge and now huger since we
> copied gtk2 over. AI work, agents, etc are going to make it bigger still.

> This is an easy separation.


> far easier for example than the 

> now defunct vim separation (and that wasn't so bad).


> I would suggest a separate cvs module, but cvs-snapshots should _not_
> include them. For the release, we could provide both together and separate
> with little problem.

If we don't include the sounds in the normal CVS tree I don't see much
in using a seperate CVS tree. You can't make diffs anyway. Just number
the sound tars, archive the last n versions (shouldn't change this
much) and put them in a easy to find place if


 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Of course, someone who knows more about this will correct me if I'm
  wrong, and someone who knows less will correct me if I'm right."
    -- David Palmer (palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]