Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Kaufman <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Per I. Mathisen" <Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15
From: Paul Zastoupil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:56:02 -0800

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:53:17PM +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:44:45PM +0000, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> > 
> > > > > >  - we have to decide whether we include the stdsounds wavs in the
> > > > > >  normal CVS tree or in another tree or provide them as tar.gz (we 
> > > > > > have
> > > > > >  to decide the same (one tar with source and wavs OR one source tar
> > > > > >  and one sound tar) for the distribution of the release. But this
> > > > > >  doesn't have to happen now)
> > > > > 
> > > > > My vote is for cvs.
> > > 
> > > I am against this, the codebase is already huge and now huger since we
> > > copied gtk2 over. AI work, agents, etc are going to make it bigger still.
> > > This is an easy separation. far easier for example than the now defunct 
> > > vim
> > > separation (and that wasn't so bad).
> > > 
> > > I would suggest a separate cvs module, but cvs-snapshots should _not_
> > > include them. For the release, we could provide both together and separate
> > > with little problem.
> > 
> > could we also separate out pot files please?
> 
> Files in po/ change a lot more that the sounds files. At least I
> expect this.
> 
> > when I work with CVS, these take the most time to come through.
> 
> Same for me here.

And same for me, and I am on the same lan.... ;)

-- 
Paul Zastoupil


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]