Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kaufman <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Per I. Mathisen" <Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:53:17 +0100
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:44:45PM +0000, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> 
> > > > >  - we have to decide whether we include the stdsounds wavs in the
> > > > >  normal CVS tree or in another tree or provide them as tar.gz (we have
> > > > >  to decide the same (one tar with source and wavs OR one source tar
> > > > >  and one sound tar) for the distribution of the release. But this
> > > > >  doesn't have to happen now)
> > > > 
> > > > My vote is for cvs.
> > 
> > I am against this, the codebase is already huge and now huger since we
> > copied gtk2 over. AI work, agents, etc are going to make it bigger still.
> > This is an easy separation. far easier for example than the now defunct vim
> > separation (and that wasn't so bad).
> > 
> > I would suggest a separate cvs module, but cvs-snapshots should _not_
> > include them. For the release, we could provide both together and separate
> > with little problem.
> 
> could we also separate out pot files please?

Files in po/ change a lot more that the sounds files. At least I
expect this.

> when I work with CVS, these take the most time to come through.

Same for me here.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Premature optimization is the root of all evil."
    -- D. E. Knuth in "Structured Programming with go to Statements"


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]