Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Mike Kaufman <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Per I. Mathisen" <Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Patch] Sound #15
From: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:44:45 +0000 (GMT)

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Mike Kaufman wrote:

> > > >  - we have to decide whether we include the stdsounds wavs in the
> > > >  normal CVS tree or in another tree or provide them as tar.gz (we have
> > > >  to decide the same (one tar with source and wavs OR one source tar
> > > >  and one sound tar) for the distribution of the release. But this
> > > >  doesn't have to happen now)
> > > 
> > > My vote is for cvs.
> I am against this, the codebase is already huge and now huger since we
> copied gtk2 over. AI work, agents, etc are going to make it bigger still.
> This is an easy separation. far easier for example than the now defunct vim
> separation (and that wasn't so bad).
> I would suggest a separate cvs module, but cvs-snapshots should _not_
> include them. For the release, we could provide both together and separate
> with little problem.

could we also separate out pot files please?
when I work with CVS, these take the most time to come through.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]