Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: October 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New city dialog
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New city dialog

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Pieter J. Kersten" <kersten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: New city dialog
From: Daniel Sjölie <deepone@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:35:08 +0200

On 2001-10-26 15:50:50, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> 
> > On 2001-10-26 15:15:49, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2001-10-26 14:18:19, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Also, I've seen since a while that the city sprite in the overview 
> > > > > does
> > > > > get overwritten by its surrounding tiles sprites. Is this intentional?
> > > > > It looks like a bug.
> > > >
> > > > Oh... I've never noticed that before... I usually don't use highres but
> > > > I did try it... It's not intentional by me at least...
> > > > I agree it looks bad...
> > > >
> > > > > If intentional, please consider leaving isometric
> > > > > view for this part of FreeCiv. That should make things a lot clearer.
> > > >
> > > > I don't get you here... "leaving isometric view for this part of
> > > > FreeCiv"??? You think we should have another tileset in the citydialog
> > > > than on the map?
> > >
> > > Yes, that's exactly what I was stating. Using isometric view, the tile
> > > 'behind' the city tile itself is largely obscured. An alternative could be
> > > an option to rotate the view. Using non isometric view here circumvents
> > > the 'covering' of tiles, at the expense of using more system resources.
> >
> > Well, I think the primary reason not to do this is that it would
> > probably be very confusing to at least some (if not all) people...
> > The map doesn't look qiute the same with isometric tiles as with
> > non-isometric...
> 
> I don't see much of a problem here. When sufficiently documented, it
> should work well for all. However, I do see problems with command line
> options and the like.
> 
> When maintaining isometric view in the city dialog: what about that
> rotating option?

I'm skeptical... I will not do this now...

But if noone has a good reason for it being as it is then I do think
that the overlapping should be fixed...

/Daniel

-- 
Now take a deep breath, smile and don't take life so seriously... :)


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]