Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: October 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New city dialog
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New city dialog

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: New city dialog
From: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:28:53 +0100

Hello!

On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:12:30PM +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 01:49:35AM +0200, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> > On 2001-10-26 14:18:19, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 2001-10-26 12:12:02, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> > > > > In response on my own mail:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > LS,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems there are some translation problems in the new city dialog.
> > > > > > Al the tabs remain untranslated.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the files freeciv/client/gui-gtk/{menu.c|citydlg.c} there are 
> > > > > quite a
> > > > > few strings marked with N_() and thus remain explicitly untranslated.
> > > > > Why?
> > > >
> > > > When you initiate variables with strings (eg structs, arrays) you're not
> > > > allowed to do function calls... So you use N_() to mark the string for
> > > > translation and then you'll have to remember to do _() on the variable
> > > > when you actually use it... Seems we missed that last step in a few
> > > > places...
> > > 
> > > Ok, I've made a small patch on citydlg.c to fix just that. It fixes the
> > > tabs problem, not the string 'Currently building:'. I'll have to dive
> > > deeper for that problem. Don't expect that to happen anytime soon, so feel
> > > free to solve it yourself :-)
> > 
> > You can use _() directly when assigning directly to a variable it seems
> > (in the cases at hand anyway), arrays and structs are "different"... ;)
> > 
> > So... The attached patch should fix all translation misses you told me
> > about... I did not really test it or add happiness.c to POTFILES though
> > since I'm not familiar with that stuff...
> 
> Comments on this patch? Any hints about the POTFILES?
I've looked at the patch, tested and it seems ok. I have made a patch for
POTFILES.in (that's all that need to be done, the other files are automagicly
updated after the next make run).

bye
        michael
-- 
Michael Stefaniuc               Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
System Administration           Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH                    Email: mstefani@xxxxxxxxx
Hauptstaetterstr. 58            http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart

Attachment: potfiles.diff
Description: Text document


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]