Re: [FreeCiv-Java] Work Distribution
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Sebastian Fischmeister wrote:
> That's absolutely right. There has to be a big design phase ( UML
> for structures, GUI-planning, third-party source evaluation), before
> we begin with coding.
I am sorry, but I really don't think design-by-email is going to work very
well. If you think the present design can be made better, then go ahead
and suggest a better design by example. I've seen to many examples of
failed design-by-email to believe it can work.
> Esp. well known design patterns should be used, to ease reuse and help
> other 'join' the coding phase. (eg.: factory-pattern for units and
> maptiles, singleton-pattern for general options, etc...)
On the other hand, such design patterns may actually make the code more
complicated and therefore harder to understand :)
> We could use 'dia' for UML.
...and what does that mean in plain English?
> Without CVS, we have no chance at all.
Not to generalise, but in this case, I agree fully.
Yours,
Per
- [FreeCiv-Java] Work Distribution, Olivier Chatelain, 1999/01/05
- Re: [FreeCiv-Java] Work Distribution, John Goerzen, 1999/01/06
- [FreeCiv-Java] Dia / UML, Olivier Chatelain, 1999/01/06
- [FreeCiv-Java] Re: Dia / UML, Sebastian Fischmeister, 1999/01/06
- Re: [FreeCiv-Java] Re: Dia / UML, John Goerzen, 1999/01/06
- Re: [FreeCiv-Java] Re: Dia / UML, Sebastian Fischmeister, 1999/01/06
- Re: [FreeCiv-Java] Dia / UML, John Goerzen, 1999/01/06
|
|