Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: June 2005:
[aclug-L] Re: MythTV et al (was Re: Ideas for June Meeting?)
Home

[aclug-L] Re: MythTV et al (was Re: Ideas for June Meeting?)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: MythTV et al (was Re: Ideas for June Meeting?)
From: "Jonathan Hall" <flimzy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:14:48 -0500
Reply-to: discussion@xxxxxxxxx

There's no inherant reason why HDTV would require any larger files than
analog TV, since the recording quality and resolution is entirely
configurable.

-- Jonathan

----- Original Message -----
From: "ironrose" <ironrose@xxxxxxx>
To: <discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:23 AM
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: MythTV et al (was Re: Ideas for June Meeting?)


> No, it only works with analog channels.  I would like to get a HD tuner,
> but I know that I don't have the hard drive space to record in HD.  The
> file size expands almost exponentially.  I would do a google search, but
> it is probably out of my budget.  ~Anne
>
> Matt Pankratz wrote:
>
> >Does the Hauppauge 250 do HDTV?  If not does anyone know of a good HDTV
> >capable card that works with Myth?
> >
> >ironrose said:
> >
> >
> >>I recommend the Hauppauge 250 tuner card, it is the standard that MythTV
> >> was made for.  The CPU needs to be about 2Gb or more.  I would suggest
> >>512Mb of RAM.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
>


-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]