[aclug-L] Re: ACLUG
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Dale W Hodge wrote:
>That could be... :-) More likely it's because they were very familiar with the
>topic. It's unfortunate, but as often as not we have presentations on subjects
>that the speaker is only a little more versed than the audience. But if we only
>go with what we know well, we're going to tire of the same three
>presentations... :-)
I submit that most people who attend the meetings don't expect to learn
from the presentation. If you want expert knowledge on a topic, there
are always books, web sites, mailing lists, or Usenet groups where you
can find it. What those sources can't provide, though, is face-to-face
interaction. That's the one thing a local LUG can give its members that
they can't get anywhere else.
If you think of an ACLUG meeting as a forum to bring like-minded people
together for the exchange of information, maybe presentations aren't so
important. It might be good to have a short presentation at each
meeting, even if it's a topic only a few people are interested in. But
the meeting shouldn't be centered around the presentation -- allow for
plenty of open forum time where the group could split into smaller
groups to talk about the things that really interest them -- people
setting up networks could gather in one corner, people interested in
hardware could meet in another, people trying to learn C programming
could get together and compare notes, etc.
These are just some thoughts from someone who has been to only two
meetings but still wants to see ACLUG be a success.
--
Bruce Alderman baa@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.intcon.net/~baa
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle."
- Philo of Alexandria
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Dale W Hodge, 2002/02/05
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/02/05
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Tom Hull, 2002/02/05
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Dale W Hodge, 2002/02/06
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, James O. Harms, 2002/02/06
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, James O. Harms, 2002/02/06
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Dale W Hodge, 2002/02/06
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Tom Hull, 2002/02/06
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Michael Moore, 2002/02/07
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Michael Moore, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG,
Bruce Alderman <=
[aclug-L] ACLUG, bbales, 2002/02/09
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Michael Moore, 2002/02/09
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, James O. Harms, 2002/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Michael Moore, 2002/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Koji Hayakawa, 2002/02/10
- [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, Anne McCadden, 2002/02/10
[aclug-L] Re: ACLUG, James O. Harms, 2002/02/11
|
|