Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: February 2002:
[aclug-L] Re: ACLUG
Home

[aclug-L] Re: ACLUG

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG
From: "Koji Hayakawa" <sylf00@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:43:34 -0600
Reply-to: discussion@xxxxxxxxx

There wasn't ACLUG booth, as far as I've heard.  But There were people from
ACLUG there...

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Michael Moore
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:21 PM
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: ACLUG



James O. Harms wrote:

>Michael Moore wrote:
>
>>For example: somebody suggested a local list that could be subscribed to
>>that was of interest to them.  That is if you lived in the Ukraine you
>>probably wouldn't want to subscribe to the local list and get 100+
>>emails a week that talked about local ACLUG suggestions, meetings,
>>events, etc. that had nothing to do with Linux.  On the other hand
>>someone in Hesston or Kansas City might be interested in them.
>>
>
>That was exactly my point in "A Modest Proposal".  I believe an atmosphere
of
>free and open discussion benefits us all.  Anyone who is interested in
ACLUG,
>and wants to be a part of our group should have the option to participate
in
>our discussions on the web.  People who participate must indicate their
>interest in doing so by joining the "LOCAL GROUP" list, or whatever we
choose
>to call it.  No one else would be affected, only those who CHOOSE to join.
>
>At the Saturday Sale, there were still those who were saying (in effect)
"we
>don't want people who don't/can't come to meetings to determine what we do
in
>the meetings".  This was also stated several times in the Wed. meeting, and
>was my rationale for the "VOTE" list.  If we feel we must have an exclusive
>list, let's use it as little a possible - to exclude the fewest number of
>people.  It was later suggested that we didn't need a VOTE list at all, but
>that we simply take votes at meetings.  This would solve the same problem.
If
>ACLUG does not have members vote via the web, there is no need for such a
>list.
>
>--joh
>
>-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
>visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
>
What?  The Saturday Sale?  I was under the impression from Wednesday's
meeting there wasn't going to be a Saturday Sale.  Did we have one?

I thought it was canceled because we would be charged $40 for a booth.
 If I knew we were having one I would have showed up.


-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]