[Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:50:26AM +0000, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
>
> Ok, here is a revised suggestion:
> - The "No Contact" status is removed from the list of treaties, since it
> doesn't play any role (it never did). Default will now be Neutral.
What about AI, will it also be neutral?
> - "Contact with X" is redefined as "one of your ground units have been
> adjacent to one of player X's ground units this turn".
> - If you have embassy or contact with a player, you can meet with him/her
> (this turn). The possibility of meet through contact is regulated with a
> server option, which defaults to on.
Will AI still work, when it is set to off?
> - You can give away an embassy to the other player as part of the
> diplomatic meeting.
> - Shared vision requires an embassy.
I think, two embassies should be required for alliance, maybe peace, too.
> Does this sound ok?
Much better.
Christian
--
Christian Knoke * * * http://www.enter.de/~c.knoke/
* * * * * * * * * Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, (continued)
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Christian Knoke, 2003/02/14
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/02/14
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Christian Knoke, 2003/02/14
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/02/14
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Christian Knoke, 2003/02/14
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/02/17
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy,
Christian Knoke <=
- [Freeciv] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Re: Diplomacy, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/02/17
- [Freeciv] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Re: Diplomacy, Christian Knoke, 2003/02/17
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Christoph Petschnig, 2003/02/17
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/02/17
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Ross Wetmore, 2003/02/17
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/02/17
- [Freeciv] Re: Diplomacy, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2003/02/18
|
|