Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7045) Double trade route revenue
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7045) Double trade route revenue

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: a-l@xxxxxxx, raven@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7045) Double trade route revenue
From: "Raimar Falke" <i-freeciv-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 04:43:52 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=7045 >

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:00:29AM -0800, Arnstein Lindgard wrote:
> 4. I have tried out a builder strategy of maximizing a city (size 12):
> 
>      - The Colossus
>      - 4 trade routes
>      - Harbor
>      - Marketplace
>      - Library
>      - Temple
>      - Aqueduct
> 
> The shields and time cost of creating this city can be converted to
> settlers. The trade output of the big city is not bigger than the
> output of the smallpox cities that you could build for the same
> effort. Therefore, trade route output must increase.

Could you please post the calculation you did?

I agree that trade-routes should be more valuable.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 checking for the vaidity of the Maxwell laws on this machine... ok
 checking if e=mc^2... ok
 checking if we can safely swap on /dev/fd0... yes
    -- kvirc 2.0.0's configure 




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]