[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:31PM -0800, Raahul Kumar wrote:
> It's ok. I think that Freeciv has too many nations. I mean, the Lithuanians,
> Koreans and Polish civs are nobodies. They never had a crack at world
> domination.
I don't know about Korea, but Poland and Lithuania were once the largest
nations in Europe.
You have to be very careful when talking about individual nations.
That's why I dislike the grouping idea, too.
> The nation list should be trimmed down to countries that were
> actually military, or scientifically dominant or owned large chunks of the
> world.
That leaves 'England', 'Great-Britain', 'Russia' and 'Soviet Union'.
With 'China' and 'India' if we go by population.
For me, the more nations the merrier, and to group them is just
begging for trouble.
--
Reinier
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Raahul Kumar, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Raahul Kumar, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, aliaga, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Mark Metson, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Raahul Kumar, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Mark Metson, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Raahul Kumar, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Mark Metson, 2002/02/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog,
Reinier Post <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Alternative nation dialog, Raahul Kumar, 2002/02/28
|
|