[Freeciv-Dev] Re: patches

[Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> On 2001-08-22 20:02:19, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> > > On 2001-08-22 10:45:48, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > For you and me I compiled a list of patches which aren't issued by a
> > > > maintainer (Sebastian and Thue will decide for them self when and what
> > > > to commit).
> > > > 
> > > > There is a status attached to each: 
> > > >  0: likely to be applied soon
> > > >  1 and 2: I like the idea and the patch
> > > >  1: only minor demurs
> > > >  2: there is a/are some objection(s) or I haven't took a deep look at
> > > >  it
> > > >  3: there are design issues still open or major objections or I still
> > > >  have to be convinced that the performance will be improved
> > > >  ?: I don't know
> > > > 
> > > > Patches:
> > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > Have I forgot some patch?
> > > 
> > > What about the new city dialog? 
> > 
> > Since Thue has posted an updated version I assumed he would handle
> > it. The patch got no reaction.
> 
> On 2001-08-16 22:31:02, Thue wrote:
> ...
> > So I would recomment it was applied.
> > Since the remaining freeciv people and not I are going to live with
> > it, it would seem fitting if one of them applied it.

Ups, haven't read this.

> I'm thinking You're "one of them"? :)

It looks so.

So is there a version which applies to the latest CVS?

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "> WHY?! Isn't it better to put $(shell cat cscope.files) on the list of
  I only have a yellow belt in makefile kungfu.  These fancy gnu make things
  are relatively new to some of us..."
    -- Mark Frazer to Vassilii Khachaturov in linux-kernel