[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
At 2001/02/10 19:40 , Reinier Post wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 05:16:00AM -0800, mike_jing@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Contrary to popular belief, fortifying a unit _inside_ a city has no real
>> effect.
>
>So the 'bug' is in the interface: fortifying inside a city should be
>impossible, imo.
I Fortify units in cities so I don't have to "no orders" them each turn
(even if enemy units are close, which would activate Sentried units).
jjm
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), mike_jing, 2001/02/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Reinier Post, 2001/02/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Stepan Roh, 2001/02/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695),
Jeff Mallatt <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Tony Stuckey, 2001/02/12
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Christian Knoke, 2001/02/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Reinier Post, 2001/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Sentry and Fortify state Was: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Christian Knoke, 2001/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sentry and Fortify state Was: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Reinier Post, 2001/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sentry and Fortify state Was: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Paul Zastoupil, 2001/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sentry and Fortify state Was: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Miguel Farah F., 2001/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sentry and Fortify state Was: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Erik Sigra, 2001/02/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sentry and Fortify state Was: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Reinier Post, 2001/02/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sentry and Fortify state Was: Wrong defense unit choosen in attack (PR#695), Patrice LaFlamme, 2001/02/16
|
|