Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "martin.mcmahon" <martin.mcmahon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv dev <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:34:47 +0200

On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 06:32:54PM +0100, martin.mcmahon wrote:
If one of city is 2nd turn in disorder, 
mr. server roles a dice deciding if there is global revolution or not
it is kind of randomness, and it always happens to you, not your opponent,
who manages to survive 5 turns, no-one knows how ;-)

> Hello Tomasz no I would not like random civil disorders too,I dont think
> anyone would :). What I mean is after the 2nd turn with civil disorder is
> over then the chances of one taking place are then so great that one will
> take place in the next few turn if something is not done to help the town in
> disorder and not that it will take place in turn 3 as a rule.(it might then
> again it might be turn 4 ).I would not try to run my nation anyway this long
> in disorder just incase I could make it to turn 5 without a revolution,is
> just too mush of a risk for me .(I play it safe :) ) 

> > Please, do NOT make any global random events. Have you ever seen person, who
> > was hit by global warming ? This is frustrating. Random revolutions will be
> > very frustrating also.

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]