Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?
From: Greg Wooledge <wooledge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:09:52 -0400

Peter Schaefer (schaefer@xxxxxx) wrote:

> It needs two turns in the same city to cause anarchy.

Right -- anarchy begins on the second turn.  Technically I suppose that
means it begins after the first *full* turn of civil disorder.

In any case, you always get one turn's warning before anarchy.

> This makes sense because otherwise u have to think ahead one turn,
> forcing u to do micromanagement.

That's the way CTP works.  You can *lose the game* without warning
(e.g., if an enemy wonder completion causes all your cities to gain
massive unhappiness and revolt).  I've had it happen to me.  (It was a
single-city challenge game, so I only had one city to lose....)

That's just FYI, of course -- I'm not suggesting that Freeciv be made to
work that way. :-)

Greg Wooledge                    | "Truth belongs to everybody."
wooledge@xxxxxxxxxxx             |   Red Hot Chili Peppers |

Attachment: pgpgaJrPlaGyn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]