Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Richard Atkins <rja@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv dev <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 10:12:40 +0200

On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:33:28PM +1000, Richard Atkins wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, martin.mcmahon wrote:
> > Hello Richard just checked the civI book on this and is says"if one or more 
> > of
> > your cities are in disorderfor two turns there is a CHANCE each turn
> > thereafter that a revolution may occur." so you can keep ur goverment even
> > after 3 ,4,5 turns with a town in uproar.the most I have seen is 4 before I
> > was for the chop.:).
> So, freeciv needs to have the following things done to make its
> revolutions compliant:
> 1) Make it possible to happen on the second turn.
> 2) Make it a chance of happening, instead of the current "Its turn 3: time
> for revolution", that increases depending on the number of turns a city
> has been in disorder, and
> 3) change the Civil disorder mesage to capitals, to make it clear that
> this is a *bad thing*.
> 4) update the help pages to document this.
> Any takers?
>       Richard

Please, do NOT make any global random events. Have you ever seen person, who
was hit by global warming ? This is frustrating. Random revolutions will be
very frustrating also.

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]