[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reducing city population after unit's successful attack

["Sam BC" <sambc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Might be late replying, but why not make them ruleset things, but add the
rulesets to the data available to the client. I realise this may require
some reworking, but my reasoning is thus:

No-one can deny that having options in rulesets is a better way of doing
things - they're already there, you can easily switch to another ruleset as
a game starts (if and when you have others), and so on and so forth. But it
is useful to be able to check, as a client user, what options are being
used.

Perhaps they could be server options, with ruleset entries used to make
default values for each ruleset?

 
Sam BC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bashiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bashiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Tomasz Wegrzanowski
> Sent: 14 March 2000 19:24
> To: Reinier Post
> Cc: Freeciv developers
> Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reducing city population after unit's
> successful attack
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:04:55PM +0100, Reinier Post wrote:
> > > killcitizen should be changed with occupychance and razechance
> > > to have sense-making rules.
> > > Should I move them to units.ruleset too ?
> >
> > It would be nice to have read and write access to rulesets from the
> > civserver command line.  Until then, I personally would like server
> > variables to continue as much as possible, because they can be inspected
> > from the client.
>
> So decide, people :
>     should I move these 3 to ruleset or to server opts ?
>     ( all must be in one place )
>
>
>