Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reducing city population after unit's successful atta
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reducing city population after unit's successful atta

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reducing city population after unit's successful attack
From: Jeff Mallatt <jjm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:44:11 -0500

At 2000/03/14 13:42 , Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Jeff Mallatt wrote:
>> At 2000/03/14 09:36 , Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:56:31PM -0500, Jeff Mallatt wrote:
>> >> At 2000/02/26 00:12 , ???í??XY wrote:
>> >> >IMHO, units.ruleset is a better place for this option.
>> >> 
>> >> I believe I agree that it would be a lot cleaner in units.ruleset.
>> >
>> >Please tell us what does make occupychance, diplchance, razechance and
>> civstyle
>> >server options, that doesn't apply to killcitizen.
>> 
>> They are not bit-masks.  They already exist.
>
>killcitizen should be changed with occupychance and razechance
>to have sense-making rules.
>Should I move them to units.ruleset too ?

I guess I'd like to see all three in units.ruleset -- does anyone object?

jjm




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]