[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Jonathan Hall wrote:
> I'm one of the perhaps rare few that thinks Linux as a mainstream desktop IS
> is silly. It's a server OS, and should remain one... but whatever. As long
I don't think it's silly, but I do think it's a lot further off than many
Linux fans think.
Unix has been a workstation OS for years and years... no reason that Linux
shouldn't be capable of running workstations. It just won't be adequate
for least-common-denominator end-user desktop deployment until it has the
apps everyone wants/needs.
I believe this will be achieved for the home market when Intuit ports
Quicken to Linux.
--
Carl D Cravens (raven@xxxxxxxxxxx)
I was internet when internet wasn't cool.
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Jonathan Hall, 2002/01/21
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?,
Carl D Cravens <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, John Alexander, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Carl D Cravens, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Randy Reames, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Mike Ridgeway, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Carl D Cravens, 2002/01/23
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Tom Hull, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, bbales, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Jeff Vian, 2002/01/23
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Anne McCadden, 2002/01/23
|
|