[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, John Alexander wrote:
> No need to, it runs fine for me under WINE. My honest impression and gut
> feeling is that Linux won't take off for the average joe/joan until the
> install matches Windows '9x in simplicity, with all the inherent
> assumptions.
At which point, Intuit will port Quicken to Linux.
> But then, do we all want our OS to be making all of those assumptions
> for us?
Linux can still be made simpler to install/use without doing stupid stuff
like the Windows Registry. It will still have to have install assumptions
for my mother to install it... but so long as the ability to *override*
those assumptions is available, that seems like the best of both worlds to
me.
--
Carl D Cravens (raven@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Squirt guns don't squirt people, kids do.
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, (continued)
[aclug-L] Re: [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Matt Pankratz, 2002/01/21
[aclug-L] Re: _[aclug-L]_Re:_Reactions_to_the_following?, Curtis Hawthorne, 2002/01/21
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Jonathan Hall, 2002/01/21
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Carl D Cravens, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, John Alexander, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?,
Carl D Cravens <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Randy Reames, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Mike Ridgeway, 2002/01/22
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Carl D Cravens, 2002/01/23
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Tom Hull, 2002/01/22
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, bbales, 2002/01/22
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Jeff Vian, 2002/01/23
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/01/22
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Anne McCadden, 2002/01/23
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, James O. Harms, 2002/01/23
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Jeff Vian, 2002/01/23
|
|