| [linux-help] Re: RedHat 8.0[Top] [All Lists][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
 
 
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Adam M. Sennott wrote:
> Yeah, I don't know what RedHat was thinking.  6.2 was a rock and then 7.0
> had all those problems.  Now three revisions and 8.0.
> 
> This is beginning to remind me of another corporation that releases O/S
> software to the public before it's ready....
Ready, in this case, is obviously a relative term.  Red Hat makes 
release based on two source trees for two specific reasons.  If you're a 
geek like me, you prolly follow the normal tree - if you're a 
corporation like google or the like, then most likely you go after their 
business line of releases.
What you and I call normal realizes a new release on a schedule of about 
every six months.  If you want rock solid, they you'll be making 
purchases from the tree that realizes releases more along the lines of 
eighteen months.
Dustin
-- 
*-----------------------------------*
| Dustin Decker                     |
| dustind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx       *-----------------------------------------*
| http://www.dustindecker.com | "Judges, as a class, display, in the    |
| Moon-Lite Computing         | matter of arranging alimony, that       |
| 913.579.7117                | reckless generosity which is found      |
*-----------------------------| only in men who are giving away someone |
                              | else's cash."                           |
                              |         -- P.G. Wodehouse,              |
                              |         "Louder and Funnier"            |
                              *-----------------------------------------*
-- This is the linux-help@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
[linux-help] Re: RedHat 8.0, Michael Moore, 2002/10/11
 
 |  |